[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200703092107.23820.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 21:07:22 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] swsusp: Disable nonboot CPUs before entering platform suspend
Hi,
On Friday, 9 March 2007 09:54, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > Index: linux-2.6.21-rc2-mm2/kernel/power/disk.c
> > > > ===================================================================
> > > > --- linux-2.6.21-rc2-mm2.orig/kernel/power/disk.c
> > > > +++ linux-2.6.21-rc2-mm2/kernel/power/disk.c
> > > > @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ static void power_down(suspend_disk_meth
> > > > switch(mode) {
> > > > case PM_DISK_PLATFORM:
> > > > if (pm_ops && pm_ops->enter) {
> > > > + disable_nonboot_cpus();
> > > > kernel_shutdown_prepare(SYSTEM_SUSPEND_DISK);
> > > > pm_ops->enter(PM_SUSPEND_DISK);
> > > > break;
> > >
> > > ...so, if pm_ops is non-null, power_down does nonboot cpu disabling,
> > > otherwise we proceed with cpus enabled?
> > >
> > > That looks ugly.
> > >
> > > Is the warning bogus?
> >
> > Well, maybe. I'm not sure.
> >
> > > Or maybe we should *always* disable nonboot cpus in powerdown path?
> >
> > I think we should do that.
>
> That would be acceptable.
>
> > > > Index: linux-2.6.21-rc2-mm2/kernel/power/user.c
> > > > ===================================================================
> > > > --- linux-2.6.21-rc2-mm2.orig/kernel/power/user.c
> > > > +++ linux-2.6.21-rc2-mm2/kernel/power/user.c
> > > > @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ static int snapshot_ioctl(struct inode *
> > > >
> > > > case PMOPS_ENTER:
> > > > if (data->platform_suspend) {
> > > > + disable_nonboot_cpus();
> > > > kernel_shutdown_prepare(SYSTEM_SUSPEND_DISK);
> > > > error = pm_ops->enter(PM_SUSPEND_DISK);
> > > > - error = 0;
> > > > }
> > > > break;
> > >
> > > Foe an userland application, disabling cpus during pmops_enter is at
> > > least surprising.......
> >
> > Yes, but this is not a usual ioctl(). OTOH, we can call enable_nonboot_cpus()
> > if pm_ops->enter(PM_SUSPEND_DISK) returns an error (otherwise it souldn't
> > return at all, no?).
>
> Ok.
Well, does the appended patch look better?
Rafael
---
kernel/power/disk.c | 1 +
kernel/power/user.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6.21-rc3/kernel/power/disk.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.21-rc3.orig/kernel/power/disk.c
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc3/kernel/power/disk.c
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ static inline int platform_prepare(void)
static void power_down(suspend_disk_method_t mode)
{
+ disable_nonboot_cpus();
switch(mode) {
case PM_DISK_PLATFORM:
if (pm_ops && pm_ops->enter) {
Index: linux-2.6.21-rc3/kernel/power/user.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.21-rc3.orig/kernel/power/user.c
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc3/kernel/power/user.c
@@ -402,9 +402,10 @@ static int snapshot_ioctl(struct inode *
case PMOPS_ENTER:
if (data->platform_suspend) {
+ disable_nonboot_cpus();
kernel_shutdown_prepare(SYSTEM_SUSPEND_DISK);
error = pm_ops->enter(PM_SUSPEND_DISK);
- error = 0;
+ enable_nonboot_cpus();
}
break;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists