[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d120d5000703091254t350216b3wfb679a53294b0e5a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 15:54:39 -0500
From: "Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: "Pete Zaitcev" <zaitcev@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: Re: Fix locking in mousedev
On 3/9/07, Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 09:28:49 -0500, "Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
> > On 2/28/07, Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > > Dmitry, please consider getting rid of the list of handles entirely.
> > > The other major user is drivers/char/keyboard.c.
> >
> > I agree that handlers should not access h_list nad use their own
> > private lists instead. However input core still needs that list to
> > maintain its books.
>
> Hmm. So it appears that my patch wastes 2 ulongs per input handle
> then, in the name of preventing oopses. OK.
>
Think about the time when everyone switches to evdev-based input
drivers. Then we can forget about mousedev wasting some extra memory
;)
--
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists