lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <B28E9812BAF6E2498B7EC5C427F293A4020CD426@orsmsx415.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 9 Mar 2007 12:56:45 -0800
From:	"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@...el.com>
To:	"Pavel Machek" <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	"Jean Delvare" <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
	"Matthew Garrett" <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	"Chuck Ebbert" <cebbert@...hat.com>,
	"Rudolf Marek" <r.marek@...embler.cz>,
	<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<lm-sensors@...sensors.org>,
	"Therien, Guy" <guy.therien@...el.com>,
	"Walz, Michael" <michael.walz@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [lm-sensors] Could the k8temp driver be interfering with ACPI?

Included the Intel ACPI spec representative.

I have heard that Windows is somehow restricting the ports and memory
locations that are accessible via AML; I don't know any of the details.
Also, there are fears of an "AML virus" attacking the machine.

Bob


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pavel Machek [mailto:pavel@....cz]
> Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 11:19 PM
> To: Moore, Robert
> Cc: Jean Delvare; Matthew Garrett; Chuck Ebbert; Rudolf Marek; linux-
> acpi@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel; lm-sensors@...sensors.org
> Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] Could the k8temp driver be interfering with
> ACPI?
> 
> Hi!
> 
> > Port (and memory) addresses can be dynamically generated by the AML
code
> > and thus, there is no way that the ACPI subsystem can statically
predict
> > any addresses that will be accessed by the AML.
> 
> Can you take this as a wishlist item?
> 
> It would be nice if next version of acpi specs supported table
> 
> 'AML / SMM BIOS will access these ports'
> 
> ...so we can get it correct with acpi4 or something..?
> 
> 							Pavel
> 
> --
> (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
> (cesky, pictures)
> http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ