linux-kernel - Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.28 for 2.6.20

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070310221150.GA6274@1wt.eu>
Date:	Sat, 10 Mar 2007 23:11:50 +0100
From:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:	michael chang <thenewme91@...il.com>
Cc:	Stephen Clark <Stephen.Clark@...lark.us>,
	ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>,
	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.28 for 2.6.20

On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 04:56:57PM -0500, michael chang wrote:
> On 3/10/07, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> wrote:
> >BTW, Con, I think that you should base your work on 2.6.20.[23] and not
> >2.6.20 next time, due to this conflict. It will get wider adoption.
          ^^^^^^^^^^

> Maybe I'm naive, but I find this hard to understand -- 2.6.20.2 didn't
> exist when Con published his patch. (Con published it ~12 hours before
> the release of 2.6.20.2, from what I can tell.) How can he base his
> work on something that didn't yet exist? (And it applied cleanly to
> 2.6.20.1, the latest when he published it.)

You see the words I have underlined ? "next time". I know for sure he
published it before 2.6.20.2, but now that it is out, I suggested that
Con rebases his work on this version for new releases.

Regards,
Willy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/