[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b14e81f00703101426k1cc9d4ar465107fcb2a9bc8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 17:26:58 -0500
From: "michael chang" <thenewme91@...il.com>
To: "Willy Tarreau" <w@....eu>
Cc: "Stephen Clark" <Stephen.Clark@...lark.us>,
"ck list" <ck@....kolivas.org>,
"linux kernel mailing list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.28 for 2.6.20
On 3/10/07, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 04:56:57PM -0500, michael chang wrote:
> > On 3/10/07, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> wrote:
> > >BTW, Con, I think that you should base your work on 2.6.20.[23] and not
> > >2.6.20 next time, due to this conflict. It will get wider adoption.
> ^^^^^^^^^^
>
> > Maybe I'm naive, but I find this hard to understand -- 2.6.20.2 didn't
> > exist when Con published his patch. (Con published it ~12 hours before
> > the release of 2.6.20.2, from what I can tell.) How can he base his
> > work on something that didn't yet exist? (And it applied cleanly to
> > 2.6.20.1, the latest when he published it.)
>
> You see the words I have underlined ? "next time". I know for sure he
> published it before 2.6.20.2, but now that it is out, I suggested that
> Con rebases his work on this version for new releases.
>
Oh. That's my mistake, then. That makes sense. To me, it sounded like
you were implying he was supposed to base it on 2.6.20.2 in advance,
for some reason. *sigh*
--
~Mike
- Just the crazy copy cat.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists