lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 12 Mar 2007 04:12:32 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...e.com, holt@....com,
	linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, mpm@...enic.com
Subject: Re: [QUICKLIST 0/6] Arch independent quicklists V1

On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, David Miller wrote:

> I'm going to make the radical declaration that it be perhaps often
> better to always initialize page table chunks to all zeros on
> allocation.

That is the case if most of the page is going to be used soon. If we have 
sparse access patterns then not zeroing can avoid uselessly bringing 
cachelines in.

> The reason is that every time I've monitored the allocation patterns
> of these things on SMP, the page table chunks always get released on a
> different cpu than where they were initialized.

But its even advantageous in that case for sparse allocs.
 
> The allocator side just does nothing but emit L2 cache line ownership
> transactions as the pte page is touched.  Especially on chips like
> PowerPC where zero initialization is absurdly cheap, we can avoid all
> of the cache line transfers if we just initialize it at allocation
> time.

We have no need to touch all the cache lines w/o initialization if we 
alloc from the quicklist. And that is a performance benefit.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ