[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1173698386.13341.87.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:19:45 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mm-commits@...r.kernel.org,
drepper@...hat.com, oleg@...sign.ru, sebastien.dugue@...l.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] change futex_wait() to hrtimers
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 12:02 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Well I did convert futex_wait to an absolute timeout based version in
> > the subsequent incremental patch. I think that is OK?
>
> it still has the rounding artifacts: using timer_list there is no way to
> do a precise long sleep based on many small sleeps.
>
> even if this means more work for you (i'm sorry about that!) i'm quite
> sure we should take Sebastien's hrtimers based implementation of
> futex_wait(), and use the nanosleep method to restart it. There's no
> point in further tweaking the imprecise approach: whenever some timeout
> needs to be restarted, it's a candidate for hrtimers.
>
> until then, glibc already handles timeouts and restarts it manually.
This also allows us to add a seperate absolute time bases futex op,
which allows to remove the conversion of abstime to reltime in glibc.
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists