[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070312132553.GG30777@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:25:53 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hch@...radead.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, serue@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] revoke: special mmap handling
Hi,
> This adds special handling for revoked memory mappings. We want to
> raise SIGBUS when accessing revoked mappings and return ENODEV when
> trying to remap with mmap(2).
>
> Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
> ---
> include/linux/mm.h | 2 ++
> mm/memory.c | 3 +++
> mm/mmap.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> Index: uml-2.6/include/linux/mm.h
> ===================================================================
> --- uml-2.6.orig/include/linux/mm.h 2007-03-08 10:24:24.000000000 +0200
> +++ uml-2.6/include/linux/mm.h 2007-03-08 10:24:25.000000000 +0200
> @@ -170,6 +170,8 @@
> #define VM_INSERTPAGE 0x02000000 /* The vma has had "vm_insert_page()" done on it */
> #define VM_ALWAYSDUMP 0x04000000 /* Always include in core dumps */
>
> +#define VM_REVOKED 0x04000000 /* Mapping has been revoked */
> +
Is it intended to conflict with VM_ALWAYSDUMP? I'd guess not and if
yes, it definitely deserves a comment...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SuSE CR Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists