[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070312132826.GB20549@mellanox.co.il>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:29:30 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...lanox.co.il>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Roland Dreier <roland.list@...il.com>,
Tziporet Koren <tziporet@...lanox.co.il>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
general@...ts.openfabrics.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: lockdep question (was Re: IPoIB caused a kernel: BUG: softlockup
detected on CPU#0!)
> Quoting Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>:
> Subject: Re: lockdep question (was Re: IPoIB caused a kernel: BUG: softlockup detected on CPU#0!)
>
>
> * Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...lanox.co.il> wrote:
>
> > > So either there are other sites that instanciate those objects and
> > > forget about the lock init, or the object is corrupted (use after free?)
> >
> > OK, thanks for the hint. So I added this:
>
> > And sure enough it triggers:
> >
> > [ 858.503010] ipoib_neigh_destructor lock c0687880 wrong type 772 !!!!!!!!!!
>
> could you turn on CONFIG_SLAB_DEBUG as well?
>
> that should catch certain types of use-after-free accesses, and lockdep
> will also warn if a still locked object is freed.
Hmm, no, this does not look like use-after-free.
I enabled CONFIG_SLAB_DEBUG, and I still see the same message, so
the memory was not overwritten by slab debugger.
--
MST
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists