linux-kernel - Re: _proxy_pda still makes linking modules fail

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45F56785.5070002@goop.org>
Date:	Mon, 12 Mar 2007 07:45:25 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC:	Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <qrczak@....org.pl>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: _proxy_pda still makes linking modules fail

Andi Kleen wrote:
>> Rusty's pda->per_cpu patch will deal with this once and for all; have
>>     
>
> Not on x86-64.
>   

Have you considered dropping pda in x86-64?  Segment based percpu
doesn't really have any disadvantages.

>> you picked it up yet?
>>     
>
> Not yet.
>   

There will be interactions with my paravirt+xen patches, so I'm
wondering if I should rebase onto those patches, or should we apply them
later and fix everything up?


    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/