linux-kernel - Re: RSDL-mm 0.28

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2c0942db0703120754y13f4aa85g53bca542ec88100d@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Mar 2007 10:54:18 -0400
From:	"Ray Lee" <madrabbit@...il.com>
To:	davids@...master.com
Cc:	"Matt Mackall" <mpm@...enic.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, ck@....kolivas.org
Subject: Re: RSDL-mm 0.28

On 3/12/07, David Schwartz <davids@...master.com> wrote:
> In no case is much of anything guaranteed, of course. (What can you do if
> there's no other process to yield to?)

Perhaps if sched_yield()'s effects were cumulative inside a timeslice,
then eventually the calling task would get pushed far enough down that
others would run.

Ray
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/