[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070312155359.39020c80@dhcp-252-105.norway.atmel.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:53:59 +0100
From: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>
To: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>
Cc: bryan.wu@...log.com, David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@...xity.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Bitbanging i2c bus driver using the GPIO API
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:34:57 +0100
Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com> wrote:
> > > + bit_data->udelay = 5, /* 100 kHz */
> > > + bit_data->timeout = HZ / 10, /* 100 ms */
> >
> > Can we add these udelay/timeout to struct i2c_gpio_platform_data? And
> > let customer to choose these according their specific requirement. We
> > use Kconfig to do this, but Jean and David don't like the idea, -:(
>
> Yeah, they need to be a bit more configurable than they currently are.
> And I think it makes sense to pass them from the board setup code, since
> this is where things depending on board-specific details (signal quality
> issues, pullup resistor values, etc.) are supposed to go.
By the way, timeout seems to be hardcoded to 100 jiffies in the
i2c-algo-bit driver, so there's probably not much point passing it from
the board code when it's going to be overridden anyway. I'll add just a
udelay parameter to the platform struct for now.
Haavard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists