[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45F6AD5D.4020700@rtr.ca>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 09:55:41 -0400
From: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
To: Jim Radford <radford@...ckbean.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb-serial regression fix
Jim Radford wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 09:55:14PM -0400, Mark Lord wrote:
>
>> So where does the memory get freed -- the structure pointed at
>> by the serial->port[i] thingie ? It's not a leak, is it?
>
> It gets free'd through device_unregister
>
> for (i = 0; i < num_ports; ++i) {
> ...
> port->dev.release = &port_release;
> ...
> retval = device_register(&port->dev);
>
> which means that until all the drivers get converted to use
> ->port_probe() and ->port_remove() (which gets called by
> device_unregister) and stop using the ->port[] array in ->shutdown()
> we need to have ->shutdown() called before device_unregister.
>
>>>>> Look at changeset d9a7ecacac5f8274d2afce09aadcf37bdb42b93a in Linus's
>>>>> tree from Jim Radford:
>
>>>>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d9a7ecacac5f8274d2afce09aadcf37bdb42b93a
>
> So, this patch should be reverted for now.
Okay, so.. Jim, could you spell it out for us now?
I'm confused.
Based on the current 2.6.21-rc3-git*,
tell us *exactly* what (if any) needs to be reverted,
and *exactly* which (if any) of my suggested patches to apply ?
Thanks
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists