[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b6fcc0a0703140348o18a4b24fye3dcbad593cf83a5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 12:48:30 +0200
From: "Alexey Dobriyan" <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Adrian Bunk" <bunk@...sta.de>,
"Alexander Viro" <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 58/59] sysctl: Reimplement the sysctl proc support
On 3/14/07, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> #define PROCNAME_PML "sys/kernel/preempt_max_latency"
>
> static __init int latency_fs_init(void)
> {
> struct proc_dir_entry *entry;
>
> if (!(entry = create_proc_entry(PROCNAME_PML, 0644, NULL)))
> printk("latency_fs_init(): can't create %s\n",
> PROCNAME_PML);
>
> with your change that broke because beyond /proc/sys/ there are no real
> proc entries anymore, there's no de->subdir directory for
> xlate_proc_name() to find. While the latency tracer isnt upstream, this
> change in semantics does not seem to be intended (the changelog is
> certainly silent about it).
Use register_sysctl_table() for sysctls.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists