[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45F7E527.6030307@trash.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:05:59 +0100
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <arekm@...en.pl>
CC: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lartc@...lman.ds9a.nl
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] iproute2 2.6.20-070313
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> This patch
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg27506.html
>
> didn't make into upstream linux kernel it seems.
As mentioned in the changelog, its in 2.6.19.
> The question is - are patches adding some functionality that's not in upstream
> kernel accepted?
>
> There is one wrr patch for iproute floating around that I'm thinking about.
Last time I looked at the WRR patch it was a huge mess and
used architecture dependant types in the netlink messages.
Unless someone fixed this, adding support to iproute is a
bad idea since in case it would get merged compatibility
would break.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists