[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200703141316.05509.arekm@maven.pl>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:16:05 +0100
From: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <arekm@...en.pl>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lartc@...lman.ds9a.nl
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] iproute2 2.6.20-070313
On Wednesday 14 of March 2007, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > This patch
> >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg27506.html
> >
> > didn't make into upstream linux kernel it seems.
>
> As mentioned in the changelog, its in 2.6.19.
Hm, why no RTA_FWMASK in HEAD rtnetlink.h
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;f=include/linux/rtnetlink.h;h=4a629ea70cc4ca60a6f486f8653974af68dbe8cd;hb=HEAD
and 2.6.19
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;f=include/linux/rtnetlink.h;h=3a18addaed4ccb7436bffc9cf5fd0666f145d35c;hb=0215ffb08ce99e2bb59eca114a99499a4d06e704
?
> Last time I looked at the WRR patch it was a huge mess and
> used architecture dependant types in the netlink messages.
> Unless someone fixed this, adding support to iproute is a
> bad idea since in case it would get merged compatibility
> would break.
Ok.
--
Arkadiusz MiĆkiewicz PLD/Linux Team
arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists