[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703141711451.9690@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:15:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
cc: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 13/13] signalfd/timerfd/asyncfd v5 - KAIO asyncfd support
(example/maybe-broken) ...
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> >
> > That won't work. aio_complete() is supposed to be irq safe.
>
> Can you point me to a kernel path that ends up calling aio_complete() in a
> do-not-sleep mode?
All of them.
It's called from dio_bio_end_aio(), which is the bi_end_io function for an
AIO action. Which in turn is called at IO completion time.
Which is basically _always_ interrupt context.
So you cannot sleep. It's not about holding spinlocks (which it might well
do as well). It's about a much more fundamental issue: you can only sleep
in process context, not from interrupts.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists