linux-kernel - Re: oops in __nodemgr_remove_host_dev (was Re: Ooops with suspend to RAM)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45F88FC8.10202@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date:	Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:14:00 +0100
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
CC:	Ismail Dönmez <ismail@...dus.org.tr>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: oops in __nodemgr_remove_host_dev (was Re: Ooops with suspend
 to RAM)

I wrote:
> according to a quick test I made right now it is a regression post 2.6.20.
> # modprobe ohci1394   # wait a bit, eth1394 is auto-loaded
> # modprobe -r eth1394
> # modprobe -r ohci1394
> works.
> # modprobe ohci1394   # wait a bit, eth1394 is auto-loaded
> # modprobe -r ohci1394
> oopses with the same trace as Ismael posted. And indeed, looking at his
> trace once more I now also spot eth1394 among his linked-in modules.

To avoid any misunderstandings: Both the former and the latter sequence
work under 2.6.20 and earlier.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== --== -====
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/