[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070315003916.8a78dd0c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:39:16 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: paulus@...ba.org, clameter@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ak@...e.com, holt@....com, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
mpm@...enic.com
Subject: Re: [QUICKLIST 0/6] Arch independent quicklists V1
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:31:18 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:22:49 -0800
>
> > So... what would happen if sparc64 were to use neither quicklists nor
> > slab? Just grab these pages from the page allocator and clear them?
>
> The page table allocator is heavier weight than the quicklists,
> although obviously not as heavy weight as SLAB.
Spose so, although only in the case where we go into the buddy lists, I hope.
otoh, releasing a cache-hot page into the page allocator makes it available for
other use.
It'd be nice if you could run the numbers sometime, please - if it's OK then
we can remove code...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists