[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070315.003118.41650094.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: paulus@...ba.org, clameter@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ak@...e.com, holt@....com, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
mpm@...enic.com
Subject: Re: [QUICKLIST 0/6] Arch independent quicklists V1
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:22:49 -0800
> So... what would happen if sparc64 were to use neither quicklists nor
> slab? Just grab these pages from the page allocator and clear them?
The page table allocator is heavier weight than the quicklists,
although obviously not as heavy weight as SLAB.
I know special purpose allocation lists suck, but they really help in
this case in my opinion.
And for the x86 cases it's not going to help to have GFP_ZERO stuff
via the page allocator for page tables, they have to have specific
bits in the pre-initialized areas for the kernel PGDs, not just zero.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists