[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070315080440.GA16155@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:04:40 +0100
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@...cle.com>,
Linux Filesystems <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/5] fs: introduce new aops and infrastructure
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:23:05PM -0700, Joel Becker wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 05:36:42AM +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 09:13:29PM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> > > Are we going to get rid of the file and intr arguments btw? I'm not sure
> > > intr is useful, and mapping is probably enough to get whatever we inside
> > > ->write_begin / ->write_end.
> >
> > Yeah, I was going to, but I had this version ready to go so decided
> > to leave them in at the last minute. We can definitely take them out
> > if people agree.
>
> You're really going to need the file argument around. Some
> folks care about file->private_data, etc. A good example is
> nfs_updatepage() from nfs_commit_write(). There's a context on the
> filp. Mapping can get back to the inode via ->host, but not to the
> struct file.
OK, I'll keep the file around unless we see a better alternative.
Thanks for pointing that out.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists