[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070315062305.GA20528@ca-server1.us.oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 23:23:05 -0700
From: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@...cle.com>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@...cle.com>,
Linux Filesystems <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/5] fs: introduce new aops and infrastructure
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 05:36:42AM +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 09:13:29PM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> > Are we going to get rid of the file and intr arguments btw? I'm not sure
> > intr is useful, and mapping is probably enough to get whatever we inside
> > ->write_begin / ->write_end.
>
> Yeah, I was going to, but I had this version ready to go so decided
> to leave them in at the last minute. We can definitely take them out
> if people agree.
You're really going to need the file argument around. Some
folks care about file->private_data, etc. A good example is
nfs_updatepage() from nfs_commit_write(). There's a context on the
filp. Mapping can get back to the inode via ->host, but not to the
struct file.
Joel
--
Life's Little Instruction Book #157
"Take time to smell the roses."
Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker@...cle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists