lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020703160746v73268f1erae778590e56c4274@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:46:42 +0200
From:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	"Alan Cox" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] revoke: core code

On 3/16/07, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> > Serious question - do we actually need revoke() on a normal file ? BSD
> > has never had this, SYS5 has never had this.

On 3/16/07, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi> wrote:
> It's needed for forced unmount (bits of it anyway) and
> partial-revocation in SLIM.

And btw, you do need support for tearing down mmap for device files too, right?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ