linux-kernel - Re: Summary of resource management discussion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070316145749.GA4760@in.ibm.com>
Date:	Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:27:49 +0530
From:	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>
To:	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>, ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xemul@...ru, pj@....com,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com, winget@...gle.com,
	containers@...ts.osdl.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Summary of resource management discussion

On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 03:19:16PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > Do you see any drawbacks of doing like this? What will break if we do
> > this?
> 
> looks good to me, except for the potential issue with
> the double indirection introducing too much overhear

Sure. I plan to get some numbers with and without the indirection in
nsproxy.

I was planning to get these numbers with a prelimnary CPU controller I wrote a 
while back (http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/9/28/236 and 
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/26/12). Do you have plans to publish any CPU 
controller in the short term as well?

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/