[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1174065350.26648.58.camel@tara.firmix.at>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:15:50 +0100
From: Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...mix.at>
To: Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Kernel Janitors List <kernel-janitors@...ts.osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] A need for "yesno"-function? (and "cleanup" of kernel.h)
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 18:09 +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
> Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 16:24 +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> >> more readable). The big problem is, where to put it? Seems wrong to put
> >> in <linux/string.h> since it appear to be a replica of userspace's
> >> <string.h> (otherwise, why put mem*-functions in there?).
> >>
> >
> > memcpy(3) and memcmp(3) are also there in user-space.
> >
> Did I miss something or did you just restate what was stated? (If it was
> not a replica, I think the mem*-functions would be better placed in
> memory.h, or such)
Ah, I misunderstood it as if you wonder why mem*() functions in
<string.h>.
Sorry.
Bernd
--
Firmix Software GmbH http://www.firmix.at/
mobil: +43 664 4416156 fax: +43 1 7890849-55
Embedded Linux Development and Services
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists