| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200703172355.30989.a1426z@gawab.com> Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 23:55:30 +0300 From: Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com> To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> Cc: Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>, ck@....kolivas.org, Serge Belyshev <belyshev@...ni.sinp.msu.ru>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: RSDL v0.31 Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 20:48 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote: > > The most frustrating part of a discussion of this nature on lkml is that > > earlier information in a thread seems to be long forgotten after a few > > days and all that is left is the one reporter having a problem. > > One? I'm not the only person who reported regression. Mike, I'm not saying RSDL is perfect, but v0.31 is by far better than mainline. Try this easy test: startx with the vesa driver run reflect from the mesa5.0-demos load 5 cpu-hogs start moving the mouse On my desktop, mainline completely breaks down, and no nicing may rescue. On RSDL, even without nicing, the desktop is at least useable. What we need is constructive criticism to improve the situation, either with mainline or with RSDL. And for now RSDL is better. Thanks! -- Al - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists