linux-kernel - Re: forced umount?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <170fa0d20703162237m1023cbd2o8ccf9e464c53f4a0@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 17 Mar 2007 00:37:26 -0500
From:	"Mike Snitzer" <snitzer@...il.com>
To:	"Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: forced umount?

On 3/16/07, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
> Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > Is this forced umount work even considered worthwhile by the greater
> > Linux community?  Is anyone actively working on this?
>
> Have a look at all the discussion about revoke/frevoke on lkml over the
> last week or two.

Thanks for the heads up; its good to see that Pekka Enberg's work has
continued.  I actually stumbled onto that line of work earlier while
searching for more info on Tigran Aivazian's forced unmount (badfs)
patches:
http://lwn.net/Articles/192632/

Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/