| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1174110965.7911.44.camel@Homer.simpson.net> Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 06:56:05 +0100 From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> To: Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net> Cc: Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>, ck@....kolivas.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: RSDL v0.31 On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 21:24 -0700, Nicholas Miell wrote: > Sorry, I haven't really been following this thread and now I'm confused. > > You're saying that it's somehow the scheduler's fault that X isn't > running with a high enough priority? I'm saying that the current scheduler adjusts for interactive loads, this new one doesn't. I'm seeing interactivity regressions, and they are not fixed with nice unless nice is used to maximum effect. I'm saying yes, I can lower my expectations, but no I don't want to. A four line summary is as short as I can make it. -Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists