[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1174112768.3144.8.camel@entropy>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 23:26:08 -0700
From: Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>, ck@....kolivas.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RSDL v0.31
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 06:56 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 21:24 -0700, Nicholas Miell wrote:
>
> > Sorry, I haven't really been following this thread and now I'm confused.
> >
> > You're saying that it's somehow the scheduler's fault that X isn't
> > running with a high enough priority?
>
> I'm saying that the current scheduler adjusts for interactive loads,
> this new one doesn't. I'm seeing interactivity regressions, and they
> are not fixed with nice unless nice is used to maximum effect. I'm
> saying yes, I can lower my expectations, but no I don't want to.
>
> A four line summary is as short as I can make it.
>
> -Mike
Uh, no. Essentially, the current scheduler works around X's brokenness,
in an often unpredictable manner.
RSDL appears to be completely deterministic, which is a very strong
virtue.
The X people have plans for how to go about fixing this, but until then,
there's no reason to hold up kernel development.
--
Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists