linux-kernel - Re: RSDL v0.31

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 17 Mar 2007 08:11:57 +0100
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>
Cc:	Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>, ck@....kolivas.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RSDL v0.31

On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 23:26 -0700, Nicholas Miell wrote:

> RSDL appears to be completely deterministic, which is a very strong
> virtue.

Yes.  That's why RSDL aroused my curiosity big time.

> The X people have plans for how to go about fixing this, but until then,
> there's no reason to hold up kernel development.

I'm not in a position to hold up development.

On a side note, I wonder how long it's going to take to fix all the
X/client combinations out there.

	-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/