[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1174115517.7911.66.camel@Homer.simpson.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 08:11:57 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>
Cc: Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>, ck@....kolivas.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RSDL v0.31
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 23:26 -0700, Nicholas Miell wrote:
> RSDL appears to be completely deterministic, which is a very strong
> virtue.
Yes. That's why RSDL aroused my curiosity big time.
> The X people have plans for how to go about fixing this, but until then,
> there's no reason to hold up kernel development.
I'm not in a position to hold up development.
On a side note, I wonder how long it's going to take to fix all the
X/client combinations out there.
-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists