[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703171830130.4964@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 18:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...o.co.il>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>, ck@....kolivas.org,
Serge Belyshev <belyshev@...ni.sinp.msu.ru>,
Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>
> One issue this raises is prioritizing users on a system, threads within
> processes, jobs within users, etc.
Doing some "classing" even by just euid might be a good idea. It would
actually catch X automatically most of the time, because the euid of the X
server is likely to be root, so even for the "trivial" desktop example, it
would kind of automatically mean that X would get about 50% of CPU time
even if you have a hundred user clients, just because that's "fair" by
euid.
Dunno. I guess a lot of people would like to then manage the classes,
which would be painful as hell.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists