linux-kernel - Re: RSDL v0.31

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703190035380.3794@grinch.ro>
Date:	Mon, 19 Mar 2007 00:45:30 +0200 (EET)
From:	Szonyi Calin <caszonyi@...il.com>
To:	Lee Revell <rlrevell@...-job.com>
cc:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>,
	Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>, ck@....kolivas.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RSDL v0.31

On Sun, 18 Mar 2007, Lee Revell wrote:

> On 3/17/07, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> wrote:
>> P.S.  "utter failure" was too harsh.  What sticks in my craw is that the
>> world has to adjust to fit this new scheduler.
>
> I have never seen X run nearly as smooth as our favorite proprietary
> OS on similar spec hardware with ANY scheduler.
>

i have never seen Windows (or were you talking about Mac OSX ?) run 
smooth. Win2k (scheduler) is almost usable if your computer is very fast 
but on common hardware every version of windows for me was a joke. or
maybe you have a special version ;) [1]

I don't run KDE or Gnome in linux so ... maybe that's the problem ;)

[1] And no, i don't consider waiting 2-5-20-50 seconds for a program to 
start a feature. YMMV

--

"frate, trezeste-te, aici nu-i razboiul stelelor"
 				Radu R. pe offtopic at lug.ro

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/