[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070318225831.GB3802@Ahmed>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 00:58:31 +0200
From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: i386: Why putting __USER_DS in kernel threads stack initialization?
Hi list,
Reading the kernel threads initialization code I see:
int kernel_thread(...) {
struct pt_regs regs;
memset(®s, 0, sizeof(regs));
[...]
** regs.xds = __USER_DS;
** regs.xes = __USER_DS;
[...]
/* Ok, create the new process.. */
return do_fork(flags | CLONE_VM | CLONE_UNTRACED, 0, ®s, \
0, NULL, NULL);
Continuing with the code, the threads stack (beginning from %esp) is
initialized with the passed *regs from do_fork:
int copy_thread(..., struct task_struct *p, struct pt_regs *regs) {
struct pt_regs * childregs;
struct task_struct *tsk;
childregs = task_pt_regs(p);
** *childregs = *regs;
[...]
** p->thread.esp = (unsigned long) childregs;
So the question is what will a _kernel_ thread do with the Usermode Segment
address ?
Thanks,
P.S. I've tried commenting out both lines which led to a non functional init,
Also setting them to __USER_DS made init start but stopped issuing the error:
`Panic: Segment violation at 0x8049798 - Sleeping for 30 seconds'
--
Ahmed S. Darwish
http://darwish.07.googlepages.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists