linux-kernel - Re: [ck] Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <200703181158.15902.jos@mijnkamer.nl>
Date:	Sun, 18 Mar 2007 11:58:15 +0100
From:	jos poortvliet <jos@...nkamer.nl>
To:	ck@....kolivas.org
Cc:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>,
	Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?

Op Sunday 18 March 2007, schreef Mike Galbraith:
> On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 21:13 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> > Now for something constructive... by any chance is Mike running KDE
> > instead of GNOME?
>
> Yes.
>
> 	-Mike

Well, then, it might indeed be the KIOslave/pipe stuff. I experience sometimes 
horrible behaviour in certain apps who use a lot of KIO slaves (konqueror, 
kontact). Is there a solution to this? Cuz if there isn't, the majority of 
the Linux Desktops are going to regress with RSDL...

-- 
Disclaimer:

Alles wat ik doe denk en zeg is gebaseerd op het wereldbeeld wat ik nu heb. 
Ik ben niet verantwoordelijk voor wijzigingen van de wereld, of het beeld wat 
ik daarvan heb, noch voor de daaruit voortvloeiende gedragingen van mezelf. 
Alles wat ik zeg is aardig bedoeld, tenzij expliciet vermeld.

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped