[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45FE7E96.4050808@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 21:14:14 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: Tony Vroon <chainsaw@...too.org>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.22] Add LED trigger to libata core
Alan Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:42:37 +0900
> Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> Tony Vroon wrote:
>>> This duplicates the IDE core LED trigger in the libata core.
>>> I plan to use this by allowing PMU LED control on G5 towers. My test platform
>>> is a PowerMac 7,3 (Dual G5 2.0GHz, June 2004) with a K2 (sata_svw) controller.
>> I think this fits better in libata-core.c::ata_qc_issue(). Can you move
>> it to there?
>
> Gak. I'd rather it stayed out of ata_qc_issue() which is a critical path
> for performance.
The original place is in the critical path too. It's just at the outer
function which eventually calls ata_qc_issue() (the mapping is almost
one to one).
> Our command issu is already too heavy and not all
> controllers have queueing to absorb that. How many controllers actually
> need this hook and can we not have ata_qc_issue_with_led() helpers for
> them ?
Our issue path is somewhat expensive due to SCSI -> ATA translation but
I don't think it really matters on any modern cpu. It can definitely
hurt on embedded tho. :-(
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists