[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070319121752.GC2986@holomorphy.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 05:17:52 -0700
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Andi Kleen <ak@....de>,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@...il.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH take3 00/20] Make common x86 arch area for i386 and x86_64 - Take 3
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> what do you think about the idea i suggested: to do an x32_/x64_ prefix
>> (or _32/_64 postfix), in a brute-force way, _right away_. I.e. do not
>> have any overlap of having both arch/i386/ and arch/x86_64/ and
>> arch/x86/ - move everything to arch/x86/ right now.
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 09:06:10PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> No, no, please don't do that. It would make backporting patches
> for stable kernels a real pain. Moving only the common files
> is the right way to go for a first cut...
As if the patches come remotely close to applying in the first place.
The filename patched is the least of the worries.
-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists