linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH take3 00/20] Make common x86 arch area for i386 and x86_64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45FDE202.80807@redhat.com>
Date:	Sun, 18 Mar 2007 21:06:10 -0400
From:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Andi Kleen <ak@....de>,
	Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@...il.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH take3 00/20] Make common x86 arch area for i386 and x86_64
 - Take 3

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> 
>> Once again here's an attempt to put the shared files of x86_64 and 
>> i386 into a separate directory.
> 
> what do you think about the idea i suggested: to do an x32_/x64_ prefix 
> (or _32/_64 postfix), in a brute-force way, _right away_. I.e. do not 
> have any overlap of having both arch/i386/ and arch/x86_64/ and 
> arch/x86/ - move everything to arch/x86/ right now.

No, no, please don't do that. It would make backporting patches
for stable kernels a real pain.  Moving only the common files 
is the right way to go for a first cut...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/