[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070319143723.GA152@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:37:23 +0300
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, take3] getrusage() : Fill ru_inblock and ru_oublock fields if possible
On 03/19, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> [...snip...]
> do {
> utime = cputime_add(utime, t->utime);
> @@ -2040,6 +2045,8 @@ static void k_getrusage(struct task_stru
> r->ru_nivcsw += t->nivcsw;
> r->ru_minflt += t->min_flt;
> r->ru_majflt += t->maj_flt;
> + r->ru_inblock += task_io_get_inblock(t);
> + r->ru_oublock += task_io_get_oublock(t);
> t = next_thread(t);
> } while (t != p);
(offtopic)
We are reading u64 read_bytes/write_bytes which could be updated asynchronously.
/proc/pid/io does the same.
Of course, I don't blame this patch, just a stupid question: can we do something?
I guess not.
Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists