[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45FEB46A.7040602@garzik.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:03:54 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
CC: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: don't whine if ->prereset() returns -ENOENT
Tejun Heo wrote:
> ->prereset() returns -ENOENT to tell libata that the port is empty and
> reset sequencing should be stopped. This is not an error condition.
> Update ata_eh_reset() such that it sets device classes to ATA_DEV_NONE
> and return success in on -ENOENT. This makes spurious error message
> go away.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
> ---
>
> This should do it and better fits the intention of the return value.
> Two things to note.
>
> 1. I think these ports should be made dummy instead of returning
> -ENOENT on prereset(). -ENOENT from prereset() was a hack to keep
> ata_piix's behavior unchanged while converting it to new EH. If no
> one objcts, I'll convert similar usages to use dummy ports after new
> init model and drop -ENOENT hack in #upstream.
>
> 2. -ENODEV sounds more appropriate. Why have I used -ENOENT. :-)
applied
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists