[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703191838220.22180@sbz-30.cs.Helsinki.FI>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:39:14 +0200 (EET)
From: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mm snapshot broken-out-2007-03-18-02-44.tar.gz uploaded
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > Yes, revoke-special-mmap-handling.patch is bad.
>
> + if (unlikely(vma->vm_flags & VM_REVOKED))
> + return -ENODEV;
>
> Why -ENODEV?
That's what we want when trying to remap a revoked mapping (the vma is
there, but you need to unmap it before reusing the region).
Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists