[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070319163754.GC8331@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:37:54 +0100
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...o.co.il>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...ibm.com>,
kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 0/15] KVM userspace interface updates
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 06:02:57PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Heiko Carstens wrote:
> I agree with all of the above, and in addition, integration to the
> scheduler will allow us to reduce vcpu migration rate, and maybe do
> things like gang scheduling.
>
> But that doesn't mean it can be done now: we really need to see how it
> works out with smp and with an additional arch, and then we can stabilize
> it. Meanwhile I'd like a stable ABI so distros can start shipping
> kvm without worrying about upgrade headaches.
>
> So the plan is:
> - get the /dev/kvm ABI into 2.6.22
> - implement smp
> - add another arch
> - move to a syscall based interface in parallel; userspace should work with both
> - deprecate the old ABI and external modules.
I wasn't asking to change the ABI right now, just wanted to make sure that
it is not the 'final' interface. So I agree with your plan.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists