linux-kernel - Re: [Fastboot] [PATCH] [REVIEW] Fix irqpoll on IA64 (timer interrupt != 0)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9a8748490703191138y7ff45fdbl538d2a941414817e@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:38:45 +0100
From:	"Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
To:	"Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@...il.com>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fastboot@...ts.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [Fastboot] [PATCH] [REVIEW] Fix irqpoll on IA64 (timer interrupt != 0)

On 19/03/07, Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de> wrote:
> * Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com> [2007-03-19 19:29]:
> > >
> > > -void
> > > +int
> > >  register_percpu_irq (ia64_vector vec, struct irqaction *action)
> > >  {
> >
> > Each and every function example in Documentation/CodingStyle has the
> > return type on the same line as the function name, so why not get
> > these in-line while you are modifying them anyway?
>
> Because all other functions in that file are coded this way. I think
> it looks better if you don't change the style in a particular file.
> Am I wrong?
>
Consistency within the file certainly makes sense.

-- 
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/