linux-kernel - Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:30:28 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Lang <david.lang@...italinsight.com>
To:	Radoslaw Szkodzinski <astralstorm@...il.com>
cc:	davids@...master.com,
	"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?

On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Radoslaw Szkodzinski wrote:

>
>> Consider two servers,
> ^ ^ ^
>
> Well, aren't we discussing desktops?
> Server admins can fine-tune the rights and CPU quotas per group.
>

how many multi-user desktops are there? most desktops that I have seen run just 
about everything as a single user. I know that on mine, I don't want the 
updatedb process that runs as 'nobody' out of cron to have the same percentage 
of cpu as all the processes running as my userid.

David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/