[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45FEF6D1.7020309@tmr.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:47:13 -0400
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
To: Kasper Sandberg <lkml@...anurb.dk>
CC: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Radoslaw Szkodzinski <astralstorm@...il.com>,
Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ck@....kolivas.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31
Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 08:38 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>> On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 08:22 +0100, Radoslaw Szkodzinski wrote:
>>
>>> I'd recon KDE regresses because of kioslaves waiting on a pipe
>>> (communication with the app they're doing IO for) and then expiring.
>>> That's why splitting IO from an app isn't exactly smart. It should at
>>> least be ran in an another thread.
>> Hm. Sounds rather a lot like the...
>> X sucks, fix X and RSDL will rock your world. RSDL is perfect.
>> ...that I've been getting.
>>
> not really, only X sucks. KDE works atleast as good with rsdl as
> vanilla. i dont know how originally said kde works worse, wasnt it just
> someone that thought?
>
It was probably me, and I had the opinion that KDE is not as smooth as
GNOME with RSDL. I haven't had time to measure, but using for daily
stuff for about an hour each way hasn't changed my opinion. Every once
in a while KDE will KLUNK to a halt for 200-300ms doing mundane stuff
like redrawing a page, scrolling, etc. I don't see it with GNOME.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists