[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070320222403.GQ3545@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:24:03 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] swsusp: fix error paths in snapshot_open
Hi!
> > > We forget to increase device_available if there's an error in
> > > snapshot_open(), so the snapshot device cannot be open at all after
> > > snapshot_open() has returned an error.
> >
> > Actually, this should go to the beggining of series, as it is
> > (non-critical) bugfix.
>
> Well, yes.
>
> I've just kept the original order. OTOH, I don't think it's as urgent as to go
> into 2.6.21 ("been there forever" kind of thing).
No, it is not urgent enough for 2.6.21... But I have secret plan...
trying to push bitmaps+non-bugfixes for swsusp to 2.6.23, and have
swsusp/s2ram stabilize during 2.6.22. Way too much stuff happened in
2.6.21 series.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists