linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] slab: deal with NULL pointers passed to kmem_cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:13:52 +0200
From:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	"Jarek Poplawski" <jarkao2@...pl>
Cc:	"Eric Dumazet" <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, mpm@...enic.com,
	"Christoph Lameter" <clameter@....com>,
	"ast@...dv.de" <ast@...dv.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab: deal with NULL pointers passed to kmem_cache_free

On 3/21/07, Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl> wrote:
> I think Pekka was right (it looks he changed his mind now) something
> should be done here. I think something like this should be a minimum:
>
> BUG_ON(!objp || virt_to_cache(objp) != cachep);
>
> to show distinctly what's going on.

No, if we were to add a NULL check in kmem_cache_free(), it should
behave like kfree() does. Anyway, if you feel about this strongly I
suspect the best solution is to add a __kmem_cache_free which does
_not_ have the NULL check and convert those super-hot paths to use it.
Sort of what Andrew suggested already.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/