[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020703210521q10ad95d4g760010bd4388c71f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:21:16 +0200
From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: "Eric Dumazet" <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc: "Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Christoph Lameter" <christoph@...eter.com>,
"linux kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] SLAB : [NUMA] keep nodeid in struct page instead of struct slab
On 3/21/07, Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com> wrote:
> In order to avoid a cache miss in kmem_cache_free() on NUMA and reduce hot path
> length, we could exploit the following common facts.
It would be nice if you could cc me for slab patches.
On 3/21/07, Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com> wrote:
> -static inline void page_set_cache(struct page *page, struct kmem_cache *cache)
> +static inline void page_set_cache_slab_nodeid(struct page *page,
> + struct kmem_cache *cache, struct slab *slab, int nodeid)
> {
> + page->lru.prev = (struct list_head *)slab;
> +#ifdef KEEP_NODEID_IN_PAGE
> + page->lru.next = (struct list_head *)((long)cache + nodeid);
> +#else
> page->lru.next = (struct list_head *)cache;
> +#endif
> +#ifdef KEEP_NODEID_IN_SLAB
> + slab->nodeid = nodeid;
> +#endif
Can we please have a slab_get_nid() and slab_set_nid() instead which
reduces the need for #ifdefs?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists