[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070321142350.GB78@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:23:50 +0300
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ibm.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] 2.6.21-rc4-mm1: freezing of processes broken
On 03/21, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 19:23 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > >> > Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
> > >
> > > Bisection shows that the freezing of processes has been broken by one of the
> > > patches:
> > >
> > > remove-the-likelypid-check-in-copy_process.patch
> >
> > Grr. Oleg's review of remove-the-likelypid-check-in-copy-process
> > showed it to be questionable (and it was just an optimization)
> > so we can get rid of that one easily.
> >
> > Although all it did that was really questionable was add
> > the idle process to the global process list and bump a process
> > count when we forked the idle process. Not dramatically dangerous
> > things.
>
> Could the freezer code be trying to freeze the idle thread as a result?
Yes. remove-the-likelypid-check-in-copy_process.patch make idle threads
visible to for_each_process/do_each_thread. Note also that idle threads
have ->mm != NULL. freezer, oom_kill, move_task_off_dead_cpu, etc, should
not see idle threads, but they do now.
Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists