linux-kernel - Re: [linux-pm] 2.6.21-rc4-mm1: freezing of processes broken

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:45:16 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ibm.com>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] 2.6.21-rc4-mm1: freezing of processes broken

On Wednesday, 21 March 2007 15:23, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 03/21, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 19:23 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > >> > Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
> > > >
> > > > Bisection shows that the freezing of processes has been broken by one of the
> > > > patches:
> > > >
> > > > remove-the-likelypid-check-in-copy_process.patch
> > > 
> > > Grr.  Oleg's review of remove-the-likelypid-check-in-copy-process
> > > showed it to be questionable (and it was just an optimization)
> > > so we can get rid of that one easily. 
> > > 
> > > Although all it did that was really questionable was add
> > > the idle process to the global process list and bump a process
> > > count when we forked the idle process.  Not dramatically dangerous
> > > things.
> > 
> > Could the freezer code be trying to freeze the idle thread as a result?
> 
> Yes. remove-the-likelypid-check-in-copy_process.patch make idle threads
> visible to for_each_process/do_each_thread. Note also that idle threads
> have ->mm != NULL. freezer, oom_kill, move_task_off_dead_cpu, etc, should
> not see idle threads, but they do now.

Well, I think this is a good enough reason for asking Andrew to drop this
patch.

Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/