linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] hugetlb: pagetable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:01:07 +0000
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
Cc:	Adam Litke <agl@...ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Ken Chen <kenchen@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] hugetlb: pagetable_operations API (V2)

On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 03:55:54PM +0000, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Adam Litke wrote:
> > Andrew, given the favorable review of these patches the last time around, would
> > you consider them for the -mm tree?  Does anyone else have any objections?
> 
> I quite fail to understand the enthusiasm for these patches.  All they
> do is make the already ugly interfaces to hugetlb more obscure than at
> present, and open the door to even uglier stuff later.  Don't you need
> to wait for at least one other user of these interfaces to emerge,
> to get a better idea of whether they're appropriate?

*nod*
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/